OPINION: Rape – the new thrill factor in film


I often hear the elderly say “when I was young women knew their place in society”.  Back in the 50’s women were there to cook the dinner, care for the children and not much else.  We now think of this time and just laugh, we don’t allow ourselves to be treated that way anymore, or do we?  This made me think of a film I would rather forget.  Straw Dogs (2011) is a remake of the 1971’s film.  It has a twisted way of looking at chivalry and a woman’s place in an ego driven world.

 

The film has a basic theme: What would you (the husband) do if another man wants your hot wife.  The poor “hot wife” Amy is basically just the pawn in a celebration of violence.  The film depicts Amy allowing the villain to rape her because she seems to enjoy it, which in my opinion is disturbing.  What makes matters worse is that the original 1971 classic (unedited version) was banned up until 2002!  Just shows how our standards have dropped just to get a cheap thrill!  Amy’s feelings were never really of any concern, all that mattered was her husband’s violent revenge and that we could see her in wet clothes.

I am not saying that violence against women is new, it is just unnecessary. The 1970’s was particularly notorious for rape and violence in film, A Clockwork Orange was the centerpiece.  These films although disturbing, were a reflection of the time they were made in.  The original Straw Dogs had its place then, but why now?  Surely women have been empowered enough to be seen differently?

Another recent film with rape as a central theme is The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011).  We get to see the rape in great detail, but luckily we also get to see the victim take her revenge. Although it has been praised for its almost unnatural truthfulness in exploring Stieg Larsson’s idea, it is still in my opinion a bit strange that this film was such a hit but it can probably be attributed to the fact that we as filmgoers have been desensitized into believing that women don’t matter in film. Rape being in mainstream titles is just a symptom of this.

Now, it would be easy to argue that not all films cast women this way, but the stereotype of a strong male rescuing a helpless female lingers.  The stereotyping of women is so common that it has been documented in scientific literature.

I have made my own check list just to prove how easy it really is:

  1. Hot almost naked chick: check
  2. Male lead actor: check
  3. Role of female – to be the love interest: check

 

Take a blockbuster like Transformers. If you look at the checklist it basically has exactly the same elements. Even Avatar fits the profile if you think about it!

Now combine this stereotype with female objectification in advertising and we can explain the trend. Advertisers are bold to defend this by arguing that women are less fussy about what they would like to watch, so they intentionally target young male audiences. Apparently women don’t really care what is on TV/at the cinema as long as they can be with their better half.  So male audiences are thrilled to get even more action, more boobs and less female emotion.

 

Luckily there is a new trend that is reinventing popular film by casting female actors in very different roles. Think about films like Erin Brockovich, Kill Bill and even Bridesmaids.  Interestingly enough The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo has both elements; the stereotype and a strong heroine.

 

 

Very often these women still end up in uncomfortable situations where they are made fun of, but they fight their own battles, and that is refreshing.  Wish they would just stop showing these women using their sexuality to get what they want, because this is just another example of the popular female stereotype.

To close, women should realize that they have an important role to play in their empowerment.  They need to get off that couch, leave the cinema and speak up if they are not happy.  Women make up half of the population, so it is time to start acting and stop complaining.  Rape is unacceptable and we should not allow it to be thrilling ever.


____________

About the author:

Margita is a creative writer at heart. She graduated with a B.Optometry degree at the University of Johannesburg in 2006, and now works part time in Optometry. She shares a tiny flat with her IT husband and a cat called Emo with a split personality. She is a Anime addict, casual gamer and a film fanatic.

 


Related posts:

Tags: , , , , , , ,
  • http://ilanpreskovsky.blogspot.com Ilan Preskovsky

    Great article and in many ways right on the money. I do have some issues though. Specifically, leaving aside the dubious remake, I don’t agree with your assessment of Straw Dogs. For a start, the theme isn’t, to my mind, about what a man would do to protect his wife. It’s actually quite a bit deeper than that. Straw Dogs was aimed at men, yes, but it wasn’t for thrills or cheap titillation. Quite the opposite in fact. Straw Dogs is, at its heart, about the senselessness of violence ad the way violence is so often seen to be part of what it means to be a man. It’s a film that effectively challenges the very notion of masculinity – most especially during that infamous rape scene.

    Do you know that in the UK, the cut version of Straw Dogs was banned, whereas the full version was passed with an 18 (or the equivalent rating back then) for the simple reason that the cut version made it appear that she was simply enjoying the rape and it could therefor be construed as being something that isn’t deeply, deeply repugnant and vile. By showing the full sequence, the uncut film makes it at least somewhat more clear that she was doing whatever she could to deal with the rape but as it went on even that facade faded.

    1971 was effectively right at the peak of the fight for women’s liberation and, for all that is wrong and depraved and ugly about Straw Dogs, it is, in some way at least, very feminist. Like I said, it wasn’t so much aimed at women as it was aimed squarely at men, asking them, in effect: “is this what it means to be a man? Can a woman really be “asking for it”? What are you really, the violent, brutish villagers or the more refined, intellectual man from the city?”. Straw Dogs is an incredibly disturbing film that I never want to see again but it did have, at the back of it, an actual purpose.

    As for the other films mentioned, well a Clockwork Orange is again a film about violence and what society should be able to do or not do to cure mankind of what is ultimately a part of their nature. The rape isn’t something to enjoy watching or to applaud – in many ways it represents the apex of the horrendous violence that the “heroes” of the film indulge in.

    The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo seems the least offensive of the lot but it’s actually the one I am most troubled by. I don’t think it is truly exploitative but I’m not sure if it’s not gratuitous and it’s a large, large part of why I like both versions of the film far, far less than most people seem to.

    Finally, as far as the apparently modern trend to portray women as strong and heroic, lets not forget where this trend truly started: way back in the 1970s when Sigourney Weaver took on the role of Ripley in the Alien films.

    Still, great article and I do agree with much of your larger point but I just wanted to throw in my two cents worth about the specific films you were using to prove your point.

    • http://twitter.com/MisaKunz Margita

      Hi There Ilan

      Thanks so much for the reply, especially your information on the Straw Dogs film, I think it clears up quite a lot of things for the readers that have not yet seen the film. You are also very right in saying that The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo is the most troubling. The whole “Rape” scene being “softened” for the mainstream is highly repulsive. Honestly I just could not sit through the film the first time round, and I still don’t understand why so many people wanted to see it.

© 2012-2013 In the Kan All Rights Reserved

A wordpress install assisted by technofreak